Why Common Core math problems look so weird

Start off by watching this video designed to explain why Common Core math problems look so weird.

The video does a good job at what it does but it is incomplete.  The video gives attention to the fact there are a lot of ways and not just one right way to work a problem.  It does acknowledge that students still need to learn the standard algorithms.  The video does not provide additional information that would complete the story.  Here are two pieces of information that aren’t considered.

One.  The Common Core has a two year delay for the teaching of the standard algorithm for each operation.  This means students are being taught and practicing other methods for two years before being taught the standard algorithm.  It is not easy to get students to make the shift from an inefficient method they have used for two years to using the standard algorithm for that operation. The two year delay and other issues with the Common Core are addressed in a a document called Common Does Not Equal Excellent.

Two.  The strategies promoted by the Common Core are not new.  They have been taught to students for years as way to help them understand how things work.  In the past, students were shown these methods and were moved on to using the standard algorithm rather than using and practicing inefficient strategies.  A look at math text books from the 1950s and 1960s indicates that teaching for understanding was important and included.  Barry Garelick often addresses this in his articles like The Myth About Traditional Math Education.  In addition to having numerous articles and a couple of fun to read books, Barry blogs at Traditional Math.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Why Common Core math problems look so weird

  1. Randall Rathbun says:

    I am appalled at common core math. There is no excuse for NOT contacting professional mathematicians on how best to teach children. A group of us tried in 1999, by submitting a K-12 syllabus, put together by outstanding scientists, business leaders, and outstanding academicians, but met stiff resistance from the Dept of Education, California which discarded our 2 years work. I am aware of Bill Gates Foundation, but honestly, if Bill cannot submit a math paper and have it published in a reputable math journal, why trust him for teaching your child math? Why are we allowing non-experts to teach math? This is asking for trouble, at the minimum.

    I am aware of the push to globalize all the children and to computer monitor them from birth to the grave. What we need to ask is why are we allowing someone to teach our kids their standards?

    The key question is this, who owns the children and who is going to teach their idea of morals? The parents or “the state” ? We have allowed the education system to transgress upon the simple 3R’s and allowed them to teach the kids their standard of morality (how to behave in society) Since when did we allow this overreach to occur?

    It is true, someone is going to teach the kids their belief system. Who has the best chance of getting it right? “the state” or parents?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s